Marat Deviatiarov vs John Lamble Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L W L L
Form
L L L L W L W W L WHead-2-Head: Deviatiarov 1 - 0 Lamble
They have played 3 sets in total, with Deviatiarov winning 2 and Lamble winning 1. The last match between Deviatiarov and Lamble was at the Portugal F1 (Vale Do Lobo), 01-03-2017, First, Hard with Marat Deviatiarov getting the victory 3-6 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marat Deviatiarov | 1 |
| John Lamble | 0 |
Portugal F1 (Vale Do Lobo)(01-03-2017)
3
6
6
1
7
5
| Deviatiarov | Stats | Lamble |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 538 | Highest Rank | 781 |
| 31 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (222-177) | Career Total W/L | 58% (146-105) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Deviatiarov VS Lamble H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Marat Deviatiarov
Player
John Lamble
51%
(
50 of
98)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Deviatiarov VS Lamble H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:48:0 | Average Match Time | 2:48:0 |
| 51% (50/98) | 1st Serve % | 51% (40/79) |
| 62% (31/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (21/40) |
| 46% (22/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (17/39) |
| 62% (8/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
| 52% (41/79) | Return Points Win % | 46% (45/98) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marat Deviatiarov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Marat Deviatiarov
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
98)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
34%
(
13 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Marat Deviatiarov
66%
(
86 of
131)
1st Serve %
60%
(
76 of
126)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
76)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Break Points Won
16%
(
4 of
25)
42%
(
55 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
56 of
126)
132
Total Points Won
125
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Deviatiarov
Player
Giovanni Oradini
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Menelaos Efstathiou
Player
Marat Deviatiarov
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Deviatiarov
Player
Mousa Alkotop
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Zhu
Player
Marat Deviatiarov
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Krainer
Player
Marat Deviatiarov
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Deviatiarov
Player
Neil Oberleitner
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Deviatiarov
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Marat Deviatiarov
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
John Lamble Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
John Lamble
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Krainik
Player
John Lamble
47%
(
40 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Lamble
Player
Alejandro Hoyos
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
John Lamble
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
John Lamble
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (222/177) | Win/Loss | 58% (146/105) |
| 54% (490/414) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (324/238) |
| 52% (4342/3931) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2694/2298) |
| 57% (149/114) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (135/89) |
| 49% (36/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (8/10) |
| 60% (37/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 650 | Aces Total | 198 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 891 | Total Double Faults | 387 |
| 1:5:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 593.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 368.45 |
| 63% (10457/16602) | 1st Serve % | 59% (4394/7433) |
| 67% (6995/10457) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (2817/4394) |
| 47% (2870/6145) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1422/3038) |
| 46% (846/1821) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (317/738) |
| 42% (7321/17271) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2992/7397) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (7/7) | Challenger W/L | 33% (7/14) |
| 56% (214/170) | Futures W/L | 61% (139/90) |
| 55% (216/390) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (146/250) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (51/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (24/48) |
| 55% (61/111) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (28/59) |
| 90% (199/179) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (149/134) |
| 10% (199/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (149/15) |
| 21% (200/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (102/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
